Joined
·
10,685 Posts
I'm shopping for a new helmet. I'm mainly looking at HJC, KBC and possibly Suomy. Shoei I believe is just too expensive.
My question comes after checking the Suomy helmets. They are NOT Snell but are BSI-some-number. They claim that it is better.
My question comes after checking the Suomy helmets. They are NOT Snell but are BSI-some-number. They claim that it is better.
What's your opinion?How does this compare with Snell.s .post public release. testing?
a. With the Snell post public release testing program you find a random testing of helmets purchased off dealers shelves. If a helmet fails the random tests, the manufacturer is notified of the discrepancy and more random tests are performed. Should a manufacturer show repetitive failures, discussions are had between Snell and the manufacturer on ways to come back into compliance. Potentially, the manufacturer could loose their certification status. However, this sampling can be as low as four thousandth of one percent (.004%) of annual helmets sold for the higher volume manufacturers. In one example, only 16 helmets were tested of an approximate 400,000 helmets sold of one particular manufacturer in 2001 (Source . Ed Becker, Executive Director Snell Memorial Foundation: http://www.smf.org/). While this is within the .up to 2%. Snell states in their literature, it is quite obvious that in actuality, the BSI pre public release compliance testing is magnitudes more likely to catch defective helmets before they ever leave the factory floor, while the Snell system is simply much less likely to catch defective helmets or fraudulent manufacturers. The result can be helmets available to the riding public manufactured to comply with the Snell 2000 and DOT standards may not always do so. (Reference . National Highway Traffic Safety Administration . DOT Performance Compliance Test results: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/testing/comply/fmvss218/index.html) This is a critical safety issue.