Joined
·
6 Posts
I'm 16 years old and I know the insurance is killer, but is their any easy way for me to get this bike at my age? Thanks people.
Is their any easy way to get a GSX-R600.....
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
Joined
·
6 Posts
insurance, is their any cheaper way?The Chad said:
excuse my parental tone but, unless you are from the hayden racing family, why would you want a gsxr600 ?
that bike and all it's competitors are WAY too much bike for the inexperienced. Do you realize what a top end of 150+ mph means - that is 220 feet per second - not much time left to react !!! Even if you have been on dirt bikes for a few years, you don't have enough road experience for a high powered bike. The 600's are deceivingly fast and that will get you in trouble or worse.
It's time the legislators start a graduated bike licensing system like they apparently have in the UK
that bike and all it's competitors are WAY too much bike for the inexperienced. Do you realize what a top end of 150+ mph means - that is 220 feet per second - not much time left to react !!! Even if you have been on dirt bikes for a few years, you don't have enough road experience for a high powered bike. The 600's are deceivingly fast and that will get you in trouble or worse.
It's time the legislators start a graduated bike licensing system like they apparently have in the UK
Joined
·
6 Posts
So your telling me everyone starts with a Ninja 250 or something like that? Hey I don't want the bike because of its power but its looks. You ever seen a Ninja 250 or a 500 it looks like cheap material. Why can't they just make a Small bike with the good looks. Damn that's all I'm asking Suzuki to do.vstrombc said:
well you do have a good point, the 600 sportbikes are pretty hot looking and bristle with the latest technology.
Suzuki must be reading your mind, because the new GS500 has some styling cues from the Hayabusa. Even the SV650 would be a better choice than the GSXr600 but it still way too much bike for a beginner.
let's face it - you need to learn first and look cool second. If you get your dream bike when you are less than 20, what do you have to look forward to when you are 30.
I was happy with my dr650 thumper for a few years until I was ready for the V-Strom and I have over 30 years of driving experience.
don't rush - you have a long life ahead of you
Suzuki must be reading your mind, because the new GS500 has some styling cues from the Hayabusa. Even the SV650 would be a better choice than the GSXr600 but it still way too much bike for a beginner.
let's face it - you need to learn first and look cool second. If you get your dream bike when you are less than 20, what do you have to look forward to when you are 30.
I was happy with my dr650 thumper for a few years until I was ready for the V-Strom and I have over 30 years of driving experience.
don't rush - you have a long life ahead of you
sweet ride gsxrnut !!! nice lean angle
totally agree - but what do I know - I ride a V-Strom hailed by the fashion conscious as a "fugly" bike.
But I don't care, for me, & as I can see, for you, the ride, not the look is important and the V-Strom provides PLENTY of fun
totally agree - but what do I know - I ride a V-Strom hailed by the fashion conscious as a "fugly" bike.
But I don't care, for me, & as I can see, for you, the ride, not the look is important and the V-Strom provides PLENTY of fun
hi jonathan,
if you go back to the orignal post you will see that the rider asking the question is 16. So, yes, the SV650, with performance of 0-60 in 3.4 sec & 1/4 in 11.97 is TOO much bike for a beginner.
the only beginners who should rides bikes this powerful are one who have driven on the road for at least a few years and have some experience operating a vehicle.
Sure, a talented young rider could operate any bike if they are careful, but none of us are born with the experience to survive in today's traffic - you have to LEARN it and it takes more than a few months.
trying to avoid a another vehicle while you are WFO in second or third gear is not the way to gain experience
if you go back to the orignal post you will see that the rider asking the question is 16. So, yes, the SV650, with performance of 0-60 in 3.4 sec & 1/4 in 11.97 is TOO much bike for a beginner.
the only beginners who should rides bikes this powerful are one who have driven on the road for at least a few years and have some experience operating a vehicle.
Sure, a talented young rider could operate any bike if they are careful, but none of us are born with the experience to survive in today's traffic - you have to LEARN it and it takes more than a few months.
trying to avoid a another vehicle while you are WFO in second or third gear is not the way to gain experience
Joined
·
10,685 Posts
The SV is a powerful bike. I'm very interested by the SV for my first bike but I have to admit that I do question if it really his the best beginner bike. I'm not interested into racing the bike or trying out the highway at indecent speed (I prefer to be indecent in the comfort of my home :shock: ). Having a family, the bike would become my main means of transportation to commute to work when not in winter (6 months per year, maybe 7 and if were really lucky 8 months). My commute is about 30km (that's one way) with a mix speed limits from 30km/h to 80km/h.
Oh well, anyway, my budget will probably be the main factor in reality.
Oh well, anyway, my budget will probably be the main factor in reality.
hello from the west Louis,
the SV is a sweet bike - I almost bought one before I decided on the V-Strom. Great useable V-twin power, good handling and awesome brakes.
However, the "S" version - the only one avail in Canada, has the clipons so low, that I had to crank my neck back alot to see through my glasses otherwise I was looking over my glasses - not a good thing.
The upright seating of the V-Strom solved that problem nicely. If the 650 V-Strom came out first, I would have chosen it. You might want to check it out. The upright seating, wide bars, 19" front wheel and extra suspension travel would make it ideal for commuting through the crazy Quebec drivers. You could also explore some of your beautiful backcountry
check out the latest V-Strom 650 review at www. motorcycledaily.com
happy shopping
the SV is a sweet bike - I almost bought one before I decided on the V-Strom. Great useable V-twin power, good handling and awesome brakes.
However, the "S" version - the only one avail in Canada, has the clipons so low, that I had to crank my neck back alot to see through my glasses otherwise I was looking over my glasses - not a good thing.
The upright seating of the V-Strom solved that problem nicely. If the 650 V-Strom came out first, I would have chosen it. You might want to check it out. The upright seating, wide bars, 19" front wheel and extra suspension travel would make it ideal for commuting through the crazy Quebec drivers. You could also explore some of your beautiful backcountry
check out the latest V-Strom 650 review at www. motorcycledaily.com
happy shopping
Joined
·
10,685 Posts
Suzuki Canada website shows both the SV650S and SV650.vstrombc said:
SV650 = $8399
SV650S = $8699
in Canadian currency of course.
I have thought about that but I guess I'll have to decide when the shopping time actually comes. Although, I'd prefer the GS500F over the V-Strom. Check my quick comparison of riding positions.
Joined
·
6 Posts
Is the SV650S good?
Joined
·
5 Posts
How abou the 04 Suzuki GS500F? It has a small enough motor for a starter (as I just learned) and it also looks really sick (looks like the GSX-R's). I'm like you in that I am looking for my first bike. I want something that looks really good, and that's why I first wanted a Yamaha R6. After I saw the spec on it I knew that it was way too much for me. The GS500F looks really good, and it has a small motor that I would feel confortable with.
-Shaun
-Shaun
first bike
Hey kid,
16 is kinda young for a bike in my opinion. Learning to drive 4 wheels would be a good idea before taking to 2. (oh jeez i feel like a mom)
anyways, i got my first bike when i was 20, i'm 21 now and looking to move on, but the bike i got was a '93 Gsxf Katana. They might not look as good as a Gsxr, but i've kept up with them. The big benifit on the Katana is it's CHEAP, i've got mine for sale in the classifieds here. I'd let it go for 1800, if you can find a gsxr for half that, you'd be lucky. The insurance on this bike is dirt cheap. I pay 300 for the whole year.
So if you must have a bike at this age, look for a Katana, or what some of the other guys are says, that GS500, that might have higher insurance since it's a 2004. I'd look for an older bike so if you accidently tip it or drop it, it's not the end of the world.
Have fun with your desision.
- Glenn
Hey kid,
16 is kinda young for a bike in my opinion. Learning to drive 4 wheels would be a good idea before taking to 2. (oh jeez i feel like a mom)
anyways, i got my first bike when i was 20, i'm 21 now and looking to move on, but the bike i got was a '93 Gsxf Katana. They might not look as good as a Gsxr, but i've kept up with them. The big benifit on the Katana is it's CHEAP, i've got mine for sale in the classifieds here. I'd let it go for 1800, if you can find a gsxr for half that, you'd be lucky. The insurance on this bike is dirt cheap. I pay 300 for the whole year.
So if you must have a bike at this age, look for a Katana, or what some of the other guys are says, that GS500, that might have higher insurance since it's a 2004. I'd look for an older bike so if you accidently tip it or drop it, it's not the end of the world.
Have fun with your desision.
- Glenn
1 - 20 of 22 Posts
