You forget...we're americans...Ride-or-die said:
<<Cheech and Chong voice>> Training? We don't need no stinking training!! <<Cheech and Chong voice>>
:lol: 8)
You forget...we're americans...Ride-or-die said:i cant believe u can basically jump on a bike. over hear u have to basically for a full liscence ie not restricted you have to take what takes most people 5 days training, then a theory test and the a days practical test. u have a high accident rate?
Last time I was in England was around 1980. And I was stunned at what you guys went through just to get a regular operators license, much less a motorcycle license. And how easily you could lose same.Ride-or-die said:i cant believe u can basically jump on a bike. over hear u have to basically for a full liscence ie not restricted you have to take what takes most people 5 days training, then a theory test and the a days practical test. u have a high accident rate?
I bet we've got quite a few guys here who would like to girly! :lol:Susan said:Perhaps I will get jumped on by both sides but here are my thoughts:
For the most part, a nice, curvy road out in the sticks will be either 40 or 45 mph (64 or 72 kph). Some will be 50 or 55 (80 or 89 kph) We have 'suggested' speeds for the corners, but they are only suggestions (at least in Tennessee), not speed limits.Ride-or-die said:what are ur speed limits on various roads?
Just to set the record straight ... we are not against stunters! We (if I may speak for the majority of the 'regulars' around here) are opposed to irresponsbile riding on public roads. If you want to do wheelies and stoppies, then wear your gear, and do them on a track or somewhere else where you aren't putting anyone else at risk. There is nothing wrong with takingRide-or-die said:... i just dont preach to people and this web site is a bit againts stunters. ...
Flag on the post!! Ah that's gonna be a 15 yard penelty for missquoting the great American Mel Brooks classic "Blazing Saddles!"SuzukiGirl1 said:You forget...we're americans...
<<Cheech and Chong voice>> Training? We don't need no stinking training!! <<Cheech and Chong voice>>
:lol: 8)
Thanks for the laugh! :lol: :lol: :lol:SuzukiGirl1 said:I bet we've got quite a few guys here who would like to girly! :lol:Susan said:Perhaps I will get jumped on by both sides but here are my thoughts:
If this is what you do to people that you care for, my sympathy goes out to the ones you've met and love.SuzukiGirl1 said:But...seriously...I agree with you as well. For the most part, we give people crap because we actually care and don't want anything bad to happen to someone...even if we haven't met them face to face.
As they would refuse to treat drunk drivers, un restrained drivers, driver with suspened license?? Got your answer right hear, Morgan, Colling and Gilbert - For The PeopleHardware said:Well, I've seen these debates in other motorcycle forums over gear.
For those who think that they have a right to ride in shorts and flip flops I have one question.
How wuld you feel, if, (after you go down in no gear) - the paramedics and ER staff refused you treatment because you didn't avail yourself of the most basic opportunity to minimise said injuries?
Just curious to see what the thoughts are on that.
I believe the question was "what do you think" as opposed to "is it legal."Nexus242 said:As they would refuse to treat drunk drivers, un restrained drivers, driver with suspened license?? Got your answer right hear, Morgan, Colling and Gilbert - For The PeopleHardware said:Well, I've seen these debates in other motorcycle forums over gear.
For those who think that they have a right to ride in shorts and flip flops I have one question.
How wuld you feel, if, (after you go down in no gear) - the paramedics and ER staff refused you treatment because you didn't avail yourself of the most basic opportunity to minimise said injuries?
Just curious to see what the thoughts are on that.
Next you'll ask if hospitals should refuse care if you don't have insurance!!
Lastly gear, except for helmets in 20 states, isn't required by the DOT, AMA or your insurance company. And DON'T tell you think they should be involved with that area.
Interesting.Nexus242 said:As they would refuse to treat drunk drivers, un restrained drivers, driver with suspened license?? Got your answer right hear, Morgan, Colling and Gilbert - For The PeopleHardware said:Well, I've seen these debates in other motorcycle forums over gear.
For those who think that they have a right to ride in shorts and flip flops I have one question.
How wuld you feel, if, (after you go down in no gear) - the paramedics and ER staff refused you treatment because you didn't avail yourself of the most basic opportunity to minimise said injuries?
Just curious to see what the thoughts are on that.
Next you'll ask if hospitals should refuse care if you don't have insurance!!
Lastly gear, except for helmets in 20 states, isn't required by the DOT, AMA or your insurance company. And DON'T tell you think they should be involved with that area.
So where does one draw the line then? Why stop at full gear?Hardware said:So, the choice to wear gear or not can affect others.
Should we assume first that all states require insurance to operate a motorcycle??? Funny how that isn't the case in every state?? Wonder why that is??? Or that you must carry more then PIP on a bike in states the require insurance???Hardware said:Interesting.
So, two guys go riding together. They're on identical bikes, with the same amount of experience, same ages & driving histories, (translation - they're paying the same for insurance).